Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 37
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I know it's a nuance.

March 21st, 2011Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Do you mean about the difference between what's being proposed? The first half, the first paragraph, is identical to the existing standing order, except for the wording “in 2011”. It has been substituted for “in any calendar year”, and the motion adds a second paragraph. I belie

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The order that they're given in is switched, but in the first paragraph....

November 25th, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I wasn't curious enough to check, but I should have.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's somewhat self-explanatory.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  He wanted to bring forward the idea of obtaining the majority consensus prior to a prorogation occurring. That was just for that particular measure. Yes, there were witnesses, including Mr. Mendes, who thought there should be a standing order amendment and a piece of legislation.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Mendes had noted that, in his view, there was an unwritten practice whereby--when prompted, I believe he noted this--the Speaker does, at the beginning of a session, bring something to the Governor General...?

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This was in his opening testimony.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In both instances the witnesses had suggested modifying or altering to do with the relationship between the Governor General...that presupposed that the system itself with respect to prorogation was fine in the status quo. In fact one of the witnesses, Mr. Monahan, stated that ha

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This is where I put, to use the chair's expression, one-off options. Some of them were in fact means and not ends, so I ended up putting them there. They simply said this is what should happen, but they did not suggest the avenue to get there, whereas the paper was sort of organi

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  A constitutional convention is a practice that is established over time. A referendum is a poll of the people at one particular instant.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Mr. Russell and Mr. Wiseman brought that forward. They were not prompted on that. In terms of Mr. Mendes's suggestion, that was his view. Whether or not what that amounts to is...you know, it's his view that he put forward, so I won't comment on it.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  These are in no particular order. Mr. Mendes had suggested that in a sort of cumulative effect, amendments to the Standing Orders and enacting legislation would in fact be tantamount to a binding constitutional convention, in his view. Mr. Russell suggested in his opinion that

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It was a very elaborate discussion. He went through the separation of powers that he saw in the Constitution, and among them was the prorogation power. He felt that this was part of the Constitution, the prorogation power, in that it enjoyed tacit constitutional protection as par

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes

Procedure and House Affairs committee  And the witness was not certain, by the way.

October 21st, 2010Committee meeting

Andre Barnes