Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 25
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  The severance claim for Nortel is $165 million. The lawyer fees are expected to be over $300 million. If we just change the law to give us our severance when we get laid off, we'd save the creditors a lot of money and everything would be much better.

November 18th, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Industry committee  If I could sum it up, Paul, what I've learned is this: trust no one. Two months before our company declares bankruptcy, our CIO stood in front of the whole company, and when asked if there was any chance we could be going bankrupt, answered, “No, there is no chance. We have mon

November 18th, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Industry committee  From our perspective of being severed, we had an opportunity to extract what pension we could as we got severed. I think an approach whereby a pension is being managed to give an option to some of the pensioners is a good possibility. If the companies funded the pensions properly

November 18th, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Industry committee  Good afternoon. Let me first thank the committee for inviting me to participate in this very important discussion. I appreciate that you must deal with many complex issues affecting many people in different ways and that laws must be changed very carefully and thoughtfully. The

November 18th, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Industry committee  This reasonable and necessary benefit serves to attract the talent needed to provide a strong, effective government for this great country. By allowing CCAA to lump severance in with unsecured creditor claims, the value of severance for building strong companies is being lost, an

November 18th, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Finance committee  We're just asking to be above the unsecured, first in the list of the unsecured, because the rest of the unsecured have all the leverage; we have none.

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Finance committee  I'd really like to understand the arguments against changing this. I haven't heard any, so I would like to hear them. If anyone can offer them, please do.

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Finance committee  We don't want to be super-priority; we just want to be above all the people who have the leverage we don't have.

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Finance committee  I believe so.

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

Finance committee  I don't know if that's true.

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski

April 22nd, 2010Committee meeting

Tony Wacheski