Natural Resources committee  Yes. The rest is largely the clean energy part.

Natural Resources committee  No. That amounted to a full release of all outstanding disputes between AECL and Nordion.

Natural Resources committee  Again, that question would be much better addressed to Minister Clement, or perhaps the department of transport and infrastructure. That would not be within my domain of responsibility or that of Natural Resources Canada or, indeed, that of Minister Oliver.

Natural Resources committee  One of the critical dimensions in all of these projects is commodity prices and market signals. Those will have the dominant impact on whether things move forward or not. At the end of the day, it's going to be private investment that will be instrumental in making this happen or

Natural Resources committee  I'm sure the question of infrastructure would have come up in the discussions between the two levels of government. That's not my specific domain of responsibility so I would rather let others answer questions on specific infrastructure plans in the Ring of Fire and in other part

Natural Resources committee  Yes. The amount that was in the legislation for the divestiture of the commercial part was funding over five years, but it is basically declining rapidly. The $109 million is no longer. I mean, you're not going to see those numbers in future years. It's coming down. Within five

Natural Resources committee  You mentioned there is a minister who has responsibility for this. I'm not in the best position to judge what is happening on the ground there. You're quite right that there is broad support and opportunity. There is an effort. Regarding the 15 departments, we could certainly ge

Natural Resources committee  That's a good question, Mr. Chair. Number one, in terms of the savings continuing to accrue, these are ongoing adjustments to our resources. Those moneys are gone. They're not coming back. What may happen in the future is the Minister of Finance looks at various proposals and m

Natural Resources committee  I appreciate the question, Mr. Chair. The $102 million is basically the base funding that has been there for a number of years for Chalk River Laboratories. It kind of funds the infrastructure. I mean, it's basically Canada's biggest lab, with roughly 3,000 people working there.

Natural Resources committee  Again it would be better to ask the president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. First, I am aware that adjustments to them over the last little while have been made under the deficit reduction action plan. It's a small contribution which really is in the back office, and

Natural Resources committee  I would be glad to, Mr. Chair. In some cases you have the titles and then you have the specific measures, so let me just try to tell you a bit about the specific measures there underneath it. From the $84 million, $54.8 million of that is the Port Hope area initiative. That is

Natural Resources committee  They are. For example, these are the estimates for Natural Resources Canada. The NEB estimates would reflect the increase of $5.6 million that we just talked about.

Natural Resources committee  What it means is that under the deficit reduction action plan all of the individual departments had to come forward with their efficiency savings. As I indicated, we came forward with the 10% for Natural Resources Canada. Additionally, there was a horizontal exercise across the

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair, I would like to know what page this information is on.

Natural Resources committee  I have the English version in front of me. So that would be on page 238.