Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 102
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Lemay. In the case of the Mohawks, the files are quite complex. The history of Canada and Quebec really come into play. As for the Akwesasne and Dundee files, we have actually made some real progress at the bargaining table, and we are doing a very good job workin

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Yes, but they can always go through the courts, which is another option.

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Yes, that is possible. Certain bargaining tables across Canada have a number of groups present.

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  No, I don't know the answer, but we can look—

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  It would have had to come into the specific claims process and then move to litigation. That's how we track them. Because they can always at some point drop the litigation and want to come back into the process.

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

March 1st, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Ms. Dunlop was not able to join us this morning.

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  I will be the spokesperson.

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair, and good morning. As you mentioned, I am accompanied this morning by my colleagues Kathy Green, who is our director of research and policy, and Mr. Kevin McNeil, who is senior counsel, specific claims legal services, at the Department of Justice. I would

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you. The three-year timeframe, as I mentioned, was established to mirror what the Specific Claims Tribunal Act sets out, which is a faster processing of specific claims. So at the negotiation table we are governing ourselves to try to reach a settlement with the first nati

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  I assume you're speaking about the tribunal. The tribunal is a department on its own. It was created so that it has its own resources and it has structured itself accordingly. I can't make any comment or analysis as to how the resources are applied or organized within. You'd have

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  No, it's actually to the contrary. Maybe I didn't express myself properly. When we sit down at the negotiating table we work within the three-year timeframe to achieve a settlement by three years. If we feel during the process that we are in a situation—every table is managed di

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  I guess the reason why we adopted it was that we were mirroring our process with that of the act. The act says that if after three years the minister has not responded as to whether he accepts or not the claims for negotiation, or if we haven't reached an agreement by year three,

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  The tribunal is totally independent from the department and is set up under the FAA as a department.

October 4th, 2011Committee meeting

Anik Dupont