Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 79
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  There is no mining in the park currently, but because it is germane to the discussion on the policies, the policy on the Oak Ridges Moraine, which the park borders, and the greenbelt—two of the major issues—if you talk to any of the environmental or farming groups, there is an op

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  The vast majority of it is, yes.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  To the best of our knowledge, they have not met the standards of land management in the park, and I'll just leave it at that.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Yes, Mr. Chair. First, all of the regulations concerning pipeline safety would be in force, but as people will note, the Government of Ontario has actually asked for that land to be excluded from the park land. It would continue to be within the Ontario government's regime of lan

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Our agreement is that we would meet or exceed, and our goal is certainly to meet or exceed. We do have section 2.10 in the agreement, which says that where we are in conflict, we have a mechanism, which has not been noted in the press, to rectify that. In the plans and policies t

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  One of the amazing parts about this, Mr. Chair, is that in the consultation for our management plan, or in the act, we have not had a single instance that the Government of Ontario can point to where we have not met...and we have asked them specifically for that. There has been n

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  In general terms, yes.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That's absolutely correct.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  No. In fact, it's quite the contrary. One of the things they are happy about in long-term leases is we would look at land.... In the past, because of the one-year leases, with drainage tiles and other things that have been broken or not replaced, they would be able to keep that

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Perhaps I could just add, because I was somewhat responsible for the negotiations for the agreement with the Ontario government, that in fact the two major pieces within that Ontario government agreement, from a policy perspective, are the Oak Ridges Moraine and the greenbelt. In

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That's correct.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  All the lands in the study area that Toronto has have in fact been included in what we have as the transfer agreement. Anything that was outside of the study area—and the study area was put forward by the different landholders—is not included. Toronto would in fact be technically

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Over the past two years, we in fact have established with all of the landholders a landholders' table, where we have looked at everybody who currently has ownership of any land within the park study area. We set that up and have had a meeting at least once a month with that group

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That group has worked as the transition advisory committee.

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

October 27th, 2014Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell