Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 79
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  It is one of the reasons that we started to look at three different and distinct areas within the park that we would need, one of those areas being an infrastructure area. With infrastructure, obviously, when we're transferring lands or looking at not transferring lands because o

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Certainly we are still at the early stages of being able to analyze, because of how broad the consultation was. We started from the day we were invited in by the alliance. We began a consultation process to see all the different community groups. As I said, we've been out to 120

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  In this particular case, the Scarborough Bluffs were not.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  When we were looking at areas, we were trying to look at contiguous areas from a ecological perspective, so that you have contiguous areas between where the park would be and where other areas would be. The bluffs would be further away than a contiguous area.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That number is interesting. During the Toronto International Film Festival, they closed down Yonge Street, and we put out information booths there. We talked to very many Canadians, to Torontonians. In terms of direct input, over 2,500 have filled out the online survey. We've had

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  The concept was created as the consultation document. We organized many of the people who had been involved in all of those plans over the years, and together we came up with a concept paper that we could go out and consult on. It's very difficult when you're out with a concept

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Absolutely not.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Yes, that's correct. There are certain areas within what was considered—within the 100 square kilometres—that in the land assembly become difficult in terms of encumbrances on those lands that would make it difficult for us to assemble them, or in current legislative processes t

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That would be correct, and there would be some that we just would not do that for, because of the way we would move through who would end up with the liability, but we can come up with an associated land type of agreement with different levels of government.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  For instance, on the study area with the Transport Canada lands, there is a regulation that says what that area is, and the only area that we have included of the former airport lands would be the area that doesn't have that encumbrance or that regulatory framework on it today.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  That is correct.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Yes. Certainly with the direction that we would receive from the government, Parks Canada would be happy to do the work that would be required if additional lands did become available.

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell

Environment committee  Absolutely: as we're the ones who are in the process of putting those plans together, we've studied each of those plans as they've gone through—

October 31st, 2012Committee meeting

Andrew Campbell