Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Bill C-11 committee As we understand it, the proposal would remove the government's ability to lower the minimum damages to less than $5,000.
March 13th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee That is essentially a policy question that would be more appropriate for the government to answer.
March 13th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee Mr. Chair, I'm wondering if we are discussing the previous amendment or the current one.
March 13th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee I could reiterate what Rob just mentioned. We can't confirm, but we can take your word for it that it doesn't appear elsewhere in the act. There is a difference between “personal”, on the one hand, and “private” or “non-commercial”, on the other. One place where that would defini
March 13th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee Could we perhaps confer for a quick second on this one?
March 12th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee Thanks very much for that moment. The bill is silent on the NPVR technology. That's the first thing. If the question is whether there is anything in the bill that prevents a business-to-business relationship to establish a NPVR model, the answer is no, there isn't.
March 12th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee Bill C-11 contains new exceptions to support activities related to software reverse engineering for interoperability purposes, encryption research, and security testing of computers, networks, and systems. These types of activities may require copying as part of that research or
March 12th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee Moral rights in the original work used in accordance with this exception would not be affected, and could still be exercised and enforced. This is because the user-generated content exception in the bill is an exception to copyright infringement only; it is not an exception to mo
March 12th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Bill C-11 committee It's difficult for us to comment on these kinds of “why” questions, as they aim at what the government's policy intent was with this....
March 12th, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Transport committee One of our messages is that Canada's patent regime is competitive internationally. The decisions that are facing companies when they're bringing products to market involve what market they are trying to access, and they will use the patent framework of that market. Definitely,
March 1st, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Transport committee I would be happy to follow up with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office to look into that to see how much I can get.
March 1st, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Transport committee Generally speaking, IP is a private right, and it's up to the rights holders to enforce it. That said, there have been a lot of people who have pointed out, to take the SME example, that they could use help in understanding how to navigate the system. The Canadian Intellectual Pr
March 1st, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets
Transport committee Thank you. One of the questions posed in the invitation to attend today was how intellectual property, or IP, is protected in Canada, and how it stacks up to other jurisdictions. Intellectual property in Canada is primarily set out in four key federal statutes, and they are the
March 1st, 2012Committee meeting
Gerard Peets