Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Foreign Affairs committee Well, you know, I think you will find quite a range of legal views on that, separate from Mr. Janda's. I would hope that you're going to hear from other legal entities. I'm not a lawyer--
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee --so I'm not going to argue that point. Certainly it's an issue that our members are concerned about. It's also why in the round table report there was a platform to come together and work out the details. And even, what's the definition of frivolous and vexatious? I can go to
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee Just go to subclause 4(6). It says “eight months”.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee You're going to have a timeline when you have to complete an investigation.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee It's an either/or: you're either in compliance or you're not in compliance.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee Well, ideally, but you--
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee That's fair to say.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee It's black and white in the sense that you're either in compliance or out of compliance, and you're using as your standard for compliance the IFC guidelines for the most part, which, as I said, have been written to be quite general and allow for a good margin of interpretation, b
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee Yes, I will. We can come up with some specific answers.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee Just where placed?
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee The round table wanted it at arm's-length.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee I'll just go back to subclause 4(4), if you want specifics. Eight months to deliver in subclause 4(6)--but what are the powers of examination and cross-examination of witnesses outside of Canada?
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee I'll answer the second question first. No, we were not consulted. I don't think you can use the fact that we participated in the round table as a proxy for that consultation. From our perspective, this is not in keeping with the round table outcomes. I don't know why not. I'm not
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee We think the government response is directionally correct—it's what we need. The Government of Canada now supports the extractive industries transparency initiative, which was a round table recommendation. The government also supports the voluntary principles on security and huma
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling
Foreign Affairs committee Let me make a general comment, and I'm not a lawyer. We had lots of legal discussion at the round table and at various points in our hearings across the country. Common law is evolving, and there are accountabilities. Ms. Coumans referred to several instances of companies in cour
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
Gordon Peeling