Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 64
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  Yes, that is true, but I can nevertheless assure the committee that we are working in close cooperation with our provincial and territorial colleagues. For instance, I chair a working group that includes all of the directors of victims' assistance services. We examined several a

December 2nd, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  Yes. I can assure the committee that the federal organizations involved are working with some urgency on preparing the implementation of this bill of rights, including the complaint mechanisms.

December 2nd, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  The difference lies in the procedure that will be used. Rather than relying on a regulatory procedure, the provinces and territories will be able to use an order in council, which is much easier.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  I can tell the committee that, when the bill's implementation was being discussed with the provinces and territories, they were the ones who asked us to put that in, precisely because it would be faster and easier for them.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  No. Once again, you are absolutely right, Ms. Boivin. The court is required to hear and consider the statement in its decision. However, it has the discretion to give it less or more weight.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  The distinction between the two wordings is that the court must consider the statement in its decision-making. That is the obligation that the provision imposes.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  You are absolutely right, Ms. Boivin. The current practice is to plead guilty to an offence in exchange for a submission of sentence.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  Ms. Boivin, you are correct to say that the intent of the clause is to specify that when observer status is granted by another act—take the conditional release act, for example—that status or regime is in no way affected by this clause.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  I agree with you, Ms. Boivin. There might be some inconsistency if this clause was placed following clause 17. It might create confusion in the courts. We might wonder whether restorative justice should be used only when dealing with restitution or if it is more general. Indeed,

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  I completely agree with this being a matter of the burden. I think that the information from the investigation is covered in another amendment we will discuss later.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  Thank you. As you say, the right would be available on request. So the right would clearly consist in providing that information. The information would not be provided on the victim's request, but it would be an obligation of the Crown, police officers and other stakeholders to

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  Yes, that's the advice from the drafting section.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Justice committee  I can simply indicate to the committee that the French and English drafters reviewed the text, as did their respective editors, and they provided us assurances that those two meanings were consistent.

November 25th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Status of Women committee  We don't tend to use that language, as my colleague has said. We try to adopt language that is as inclusive as possible when we are approaching communities or making funding available to communities.

November 20th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott

Status of Women committee  That's not a problem at all.

November 20th, 2014Committee meeting

Pamela Arnott