Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee It means that it was missing at the department. The inspectors therefore did not have that information so they could identify the companies most at risk.
May 18th, 2017Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Transport committee In the report published in 2012, we drew no conclusions and did not try to make any connection, because the department had not done so at that point. That is therefore not a subject that we covered in our audit.
May 18th, 2017Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Transport committee We made recommendations for expediting the implementation of procedures to respond to the safety problems. In response to that, Transport Canada modified its framework for consultation and response to safety problems, to expedite the process. If that framework is implemented, we
May 18th, 2017Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Transport committee Good morning. Transport Canada has a procedure to follow for doing surveillance of civil aviation companies. We have selected a certain number of companies to evaluate the extent of the surveillance performed by the department. We found that the department was not following the
May 18th, 2017Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Public Accounts committee Mr. Chair, in our chapter, at point 5.1, it says: Statistics from the International Air Transport Association show that North America has one of the safest aviation industries in the world. As exhibit 5.1 says, the number of accidents in 2009 and 2010 represents the lowest ac
November 27th, 2012Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Public Accounts committee In 2008, our office studied the transition to the safety management system. That was not what was done this year. In 2012, we did a report on how Transport Canada was overseeing civil aviation in Canada. Our 2008 recommendation was reiterated in 2012. In 2008, we had recommended
November 27th, 2012Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot
Public Accounts committee ...acted on.
November 27th, 2012Committee meeting
Lucie Talbot