Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 22
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources committee  Yes. I would say first of all that we have to be careful here between the political question of dealing with the political situation and dealing with promising help from an industry on a commercial basis. I think there is a risk that we can over-promise if we start converting pol

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  The short answer is yes. There is clearly an opportunity there because there is a need, but I think from my conversations from Europe this week there is also a caution that they will only go where they're wanted. There needs to be not only an opportunity but the business structur

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  The creation of fuel poverty is obviously a concern to everyone. I would argue, along the lines of what the previous speaker said, that you can segment the problem into dealing first with the big consumers, who should really be on a market basis, and then deal with the social imp

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  I agree with that, absolutely.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  Thank you. Perhaps another way of answering your question is, how do we actually stimulate a market for energy efficiency, energy conservation? To go to back to a comment that was made on the other side, it seems that the most effective way of getting energy efficiency off the g

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  Very quickly, yes we do. The practitioners are within the NEB. They're within the offshore boards. In fact, when Australia was working on a new regulatory regime, they went around the world looking for best practices. They modelled their offshore regulatory environment off ours t

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  I would say so, yes.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  That's correct.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  Well, that's true, but we are moving more to a global market in LNG. As more infrastructure is in place, we can expect to see more reference to a global price, and that will definitely be higher. One of the arguments, part of the debate in the U.S. at the moment, is the impact

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  Canada is just getting into the game and I think it's significant that the first LNG export project is on the west coast. It's the logical route to the market you've just described.

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  There's a lot in that question. I might dodge it simply by saying we need to get the world price. Shareholders need to get the highest price for their product, so they will take their product to the market that will provide that price. The question really comes back to the threa

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair, and honourable members, thank you for your invitation to contribute to your study. I'm an independent policy analyst, and I focus on energy. I've been following the energy sector now for about three decades. The opinions I express today are my own. The current politi

May 1st, 2014Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  I'll take two aspects of that question. First, going back to the bad old days of the national energy program, we did have a program called the petroleum incentives program. I think that was responsible for.... Of the 275,000 barrels a day of production right now, plus the Hebro

May 9th, 2013Committee meeting

Michael Edwards

Natural Resources committee  I can't comment on it.

May 9th, 2013Committee meeting

Michael Edwards