Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee If there were no amendments?
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee I'm sorry.
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee Yes.
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee I think our judiciary does exercise that power, and would do so responsibly. I do note that in our current jurisprudence, it's quite clear that our judges view our review boards as much better at determining the issue of significant risk. In terms of jurisprudence—Mr. Burstein
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee When they are making the decision whether or not the person is criminally responsible, they would likely consider medical evidence about the person's mental disorder. They first have to establish that the person suffers from a major mental disorder. Then they have to determine wh
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee It's one of two things. Either they don't understand the nature and quality of their acts or they don't understand that what they are doing is wrong. That's defined in our Criminal Code.
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee It is generally a judge; sometimes a jury will make the NCR finding.
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann
Justice committee Thank you for the opportunity to address the committee. I had the opportunity to listen to the last panel and the compelling testimony of both Ms. de Delley and Dr. Gaston. I was moved, as I expect all of you were, by that testimony. Their testimony and the testimony of other vi
June 5th, 2013Committee meeting
Erin Dann