Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-9 of 9
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  If there were no amendments?

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  I'm sorry.

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  I think our judiciary does exercise that power, and would do so responsibly. I do note that in our current jurisprudence, it's quite clear that our judges view our review boards as much better at determining the issue of significant risk. In terms of jurisprudence—Mr. Burstein

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  When they are making the decision whether or not the person is criminally responsible, they would likely consider medical evidence about the person's mental disorder. They first have to establish that the person suffers from a major mental disorder. Then they have to determine wh

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  It's one of two things. Either they don't understand the nature and quality of their acts or they don't understand that what they are doing is wrong. That's defined in our Criminal Code.

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  It is generally a judge; sometimes a jury will make the NCR finding.

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann

Justice committee  Thank you for the opportunity to address the committee. I had the opportunity to listen to the last panel and the compelling testimony of both Ms. de Delley and Dr. Gaston. I was moved, as I expect all of you were, by that testimony. Their testimony and the testimony of other vi

June 5th, 2013Committee meeting

Erin Dann