Natural Resources committee  Yes, there are a lot of questions embedded within that primary question of whether there is a future for nuclear. I could spend a bit of time, but we're very cognizant, as the deputy said, of the fact that Canada is a tier one nuclear nation, and that is really important for the

Natural Resources committee  Yes, I'm happy to. That is a great question. As you know, we have already had previous experience with this. In 2016-17, we received about $180 million to administer the first stage. We're into the second stage now. Through that, we've actually deployed 532 fast chargers around

Natural Resources committee  Very rapidly, it is a private sector exercise. We do go to the best firms that we possibly can, but it's a competitive thing. It's not up to the government to maintain. We're working with the private sector on that. I think that makes sense. Yes, we can make the information avai

Natural Resources committee  I would just like to add that the government wishes to introduce a bill to oversee, and tighten its collaboration with, the industry.

Natural Resources committee  Okay. I don't have a whole lot more to add, but to come to the question of retrofits and whether there are residential retrofits contained within...first of all, there's $1 billion that's going to the FCM.

Natural Resources committee  I would say it's closer to $600 million. We can come back on the figure, but there is retrofit money in there and it's going directly to housing.

Natural Resources committee  I understand—

Natural Resources committee  Yes. I'm sorry, Chair, and I know everybody wants to go, but the last question was a bit ambiguous in our terms. It spoke of government dollars versus higher extraction and cleaner processing, and then it said “jobs”. Can I just get a sense.... This may engage a considerable am

Natural Resources committee  Certainly.

Natural Resources committee  Is the specific question what does the National Energy Board consider in its reviews?

Natural Resources committee  On the first part of the question in terms of, sorry if I...

Natural Resources committee  Jeff will come back on the last part of the question. But I'd like to clarify, Chair, that in terms of no governance, I think it's really important for me to mention that if I misled the committee, again, I apologize. I certainly did not want to leave the impression that there's

Natural Resources committee  The simple answer is absolutely yes.

Natural Resources committee  In terms of the numbers, I don't have them right before me. But it's very clearly scientific jobs, environmental engineering jobs, engineering jobs on the petroleum side, very clearly, in terms of regulatory practices and reviews, jobs that come forth from there; and it's very cl

Natural Resources committee  For sure.