Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Public Accounts committee Yes. This process will bring, I think, a different type of rigour to work that we were already doing. As I think I described earlier, we think this will much better ensure that nothing falls between the cracks. We will have formal meetings at very senior levels to make sure that
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee Yes, and we will continue to work on it. It was something that was part of our earlier work. Again, we haven't completed it, but we continue that work. That is a very important part for us, to make sure that you don't have one generation paying for another in an unfair way. In fa
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee Mr. Chair, thank you to the member for the question. I'll start with the second question. It's not the type of thing you can simply do once every five, 10, or 35 years to make sure the plan is working. You have to look at it on a constant basis. There's everything from the 90-da
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee Yes, I tend to agree with you there. I would add one thing, if I may, coming back to a previous question of yours about the deficit. The last financial evaluation dates back to March 31, 2011, and in the markets, we've seen a major change for the better since then. So we are ho
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee I think this goes to the governance questions that were raised in the report and that we agree with fully. Over time, plans developed in different ways and there were different practices historically. It's time now that we accept what the Auditor General has recommended and imp
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee In terms of the assessment that we do regarding long-term sustainability and the comparisons to others, certainly PSPIB benchmarks itself against other pension plans in Canada. When it comes to questions of longevity and turbulence, these are all very much factored in as part of
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee The biggest ones we look at are the ones in Canada. We certainly follow trends from around the world. It gets very difficult to compare very different plans under different sets of circumstances, but we compare closely what's going on in the rest of the country.
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee The work on that will begin this year. We hope to receive approval in the next fiscal year. A lot of work has already been done in this connection. For instance, PSP Investments has a document on its risk tolerance, which we are very familiar with. In it, the chief actuary has d
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee I'm working hard on managing the plan that I am managing and working with folks on that. I would say that we follow all of the required standards for reporting. I would note that the Auditor General has seen fit to give us an unqualified opinion 15 years in a row of the Public Ac
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee I'll start with the question on the crown corporations. Some 40 crown corporations are part of our plan. So the connection in that respect is already quite strong. As for the post-2000 fund, we are precisely in the midst of planning for the next 15 to 20 years or so. My colleagu
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee The pre-2000 liability, I believe, is $150.1 billion. The chief actuary is nodding his head. There are contributions that have already been made against that. My colleague from the Department of Finance could talk about the specific treatment of it. Those are the total liabilitie
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee One of the things the Government of Canada has done, and been a leader on, is ensuring that those liabilities are clearly understood and that they're fully stated in all our public accounts. There are no surprises there at all. My colleague from the Department of Finance could pr
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee The plan has been performing very well over the last 10 years. It beat the target rate considerably. The target rate, as we talked about last week, was 4.1% on an actuarial basis in real terms. It has performed at approximately 6.1% over that time period, including in one of the
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee From the post-2000 period, yes, they are. They are all managed by PSPIB. My colleague Mr. Valentini would be able to speak to some of the specifics there, but yes, they're all invested in the same accounts—
June 4th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson
Public Accounts committee It's $2.6 billion. That's what we've calculated for four years, 2017-18, and $900 million-a-year after that. So it's $2.6 billion divided by four.
May 28th, 2014Committee meeting
Daniel Watson