Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 67
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  Certainly as we look at it in the context of the clean fuels standard in particular in terms of the work we've done with Environment and Climate Change Canada and identifying compliance pathways, continuous improvements in reducing energy consumption and improving energy efficien

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  That's what's called a competitive market.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  That's a segment of the industry that I can't comment directly on—it's not the segment I represent—but certainly, weather events have impacts. Whether you can attribute any individual weather event to climate change is a different question.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  I think carbon pricing, if properly designed, offers a policy solution that addresses a number of the principles that we see should be embedded in policy. Certainly, it provides some level of transparency. A carbon price with some predictability about how that price is going to c

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  Ninety-five per cent.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  In fact, the whole concept of an output-based pricing system is something that we support. An output-based pricing system that sets a benchmark that everyone must achieve rather than an amount that everyone has to come down is, in our view, a smart policy design. The issue for us

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  Actually, I would clarify. I think that in the government's own analysis they came to the conclusion that 80% was a more appropriate benchmark. Subsequent to that they asked us...or gave us and all the industries the opportunity to provide further analysis specific to our own sec

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  I don't have that here. I'll defer to Monsieur Montreuil of our staff, who has led this effort. It's an extensive deck of which we've extracted two charts here.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  Our issue is that the level it is set at in terms of the expectations will actually allow very little behavioural change. With regard to many of the Canadian refineries, because the gap will be so large, the only option they will have to comply will be to pay the tax on excess em

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  The degree to which behaviour will be modified or investments will be made in emission reduction technology when it reaches that level is severely constrained. The only option will be to pay the amount.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  It is compliance. Ultimately it's a regulation under CEPA and CEPA comes with the hammer of the Criminal Code. Potentially you go to jail, so there is a real compliance issue.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  It's a requirement.

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag

Environment committee  First of all, let me just say that, in many of the countries, there are refiners we compete with in our markets in other jurisdictions—and the U.S. is the best example—who don't face those carbon costs. That is a huge competitive disadvantage for Canadian refineries, the addition

January 30th, 2019Committee meeting

Peter Boag