Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 92
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Defence committee  I'll take that one, because it's one that I've been very interested in. It's the issue of making sure that the navies of our friends and allies are aware of what our capabilities are. Our starting to integrate with the American battle groups really stemmed from an initiative th

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  If I may add, there's also something critically important here. Of course, I agree to a certain level. You don't want to simply mesh them together. On the operational side, there are all sorts of issues. What has been a major problem, however, is that the Coast Guard has tradit

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  The question I would like to be asked is how we get a political understanding that is ongoing. In other words, I love the type of work that the committee is doing and the questions they are asking, but you know the system in which the committee will be proceeding: you'll go on to

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  The Scandinavian countries have moved very strongly towards going to a modular layback. If you look at both the Norwegian navy and coast guard, they can make their coast guard vessels the equivalent of a naval combatant by the usage of modularity in terms of missile systems, torp

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  I can start with that. Yes, I'll start with that one. Dave is absolutely right. How can you construe it as anything else but limiting any debate? The problem that occurs is it doesn't stop debate. What it does stop is informed debate. You ask, what do we do as academics? Both Dr

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  Wow, that's—

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  Go ahead? Okay. As I was saying on the Aurora, one of the critical things we have found—and the Russians and the Americans have found it—if that if you have a relatively robust size of airframe and it is not supersonic, you can actually make them. The new industrial capabilities

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  I'm glad you've given me this opportunity because the issue when we raise maritime security in the Arctic—first of all, Dr. Charron and others are completely right when they say at the surface level there is co-operation. I agree with them. There's not going to be an issue of som

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  If you were to hand me a chequebook, the first thing would be to institutionalize and systemize a naval political capability of an ongoing examination of the maritime issue. In other words, the navy is very good at keeping this ongoing. They do their maritime strategy, their nav

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  Absolutely. In fact, it's even more ambitious. The open literature has said it's going to be 12 submarines. It's basically a conventional nuclear-powered French submarine that they're buying. With the Australian model, part of the thing that always drives anybody when they are

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  A challenge that always faces the Canadian navy is that they know they're going to have a limited number of hulls. We get back to hulls, of course, in this context. Anyone who has lived in Victoria or Halifax will know the distinction between a brown-water navy and a green-wate

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  Absolutely. We could have a nice argument. I would say that the Americans, particularly under FDR, very decidedly moved against isolationism in the post-Second World War period. That's a point of discussion we can have over a coffee or beer. On your point of what it means for C

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  Oh, I always disagree with Dr. Charron, to my peril. It's part of the overall package. This is the problem we face: it's not an either/or. She's absolutely right when she talks about information sharing, when she talks about the types of structure capabilities we need to put in

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  That's a very good question. The immediate overall answer, I'd say, is that it's not going to be a one size fits all. When it comes to certain elements of procurement, it's still going to be that you have to buy everything at once. For example, if we decide that we want to retain

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert

National Defence committee  The reality is, and this is the thing, as academics and politicians, we have difficulties. We like black and white, right? The issue is, of course, what do you mean by off-the-shelf technology? This is where so many of us get so tied up. We sit there and say that this is sort o

November 1st, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Robert Huebert