Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 155
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  If you acted in good faith, no you don't.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  There are judges available by telephone 24/7 in this country. If you believe...unless it's an emergency. Every telecommunications providers will give information when it's clearly identified to be an emergency exigent circumstanceā€”kidnapping, all the imminent threats to lifeā€”so i

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Thank you very much. This is a complicated issue that we're looking at. The cyberbullying part is a complicated phenomenon with a lot of moving parts. We've heard a whole lot of nuances. Police investigative powers is a complicated question because we need to make sure that the

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  I think it's probably dangerous to ask me to summarize Bill C-13 or my concerns.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  I don't have my copy of the Criminal Code, so I'll assume what you said is correct. My concern comes from this: that we are taking reasonable grounds to suspect, which is likely a fine threshold when you're dealing with routing information, basic bank account information, and we

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Yes. If we can take the definition of transmission data and modify it such that it's at the same level of intrusiveness as those examples you just gave, then I would be satisfied with that.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  I would echo those sentiments, and would only add that when it comes to somebody who is under the age of 18, those images would be child pornography images as well, which brings into play other legal tools for dealing with not just non-consensual but otherwise dissemination of th

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Correct. Absolutely.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  It goes in a continuum and it's very circumstance-specific, but that continuum would relate, in my mind, not just to the progression of the investigation but to the intrusiveness of the measures.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  I would expect that as a law enforcement officer you do not want to jeopardize your investigation.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Absolutely; I agree. There is no authority to compel somebody to preserve that information.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  That's my understanding.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Certainly I think that there is a lot going on in this bill, and it might be easy to confuse the different pieces of it. Certainly there's a lot to be said for looking at each of them very closely. A preservation order is of a different nature from a production order. I don't th

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  I believe I've said a number of times I'm not concerned at all about the preservation. I think it's important to not confuse the preservation with the providing of the information. From what I understand, that 1.2 million has nothing to do with preservation. It has to do with inf

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser

Justice committee  Absolutely.

May 6th, 2014Committee meeting

David Fraser