Industry committee  From a criminal perspective?

Industry committee  Amy, do you know?

Industry committee  We understand there have been queries about it, but Public Safety Canada or the Department of Justice would deal with that.

Industry committee  We might AMP. Yes.

Industry committee  I do not have that information. I'm sorry.

Industry committee  We do not forecast any particular revenues. It is based on what the market will feel the value of the particular spectrum is.

Industry committee  No, sir.

Industry committee  Under the current legislation, although they are mentioned, they are mentioned in the context of having the intent to use them for a bad purpose. The modified language is much stronger; there is just an outright prohibition. There are very few legitimate uses for a jammer, and

Industry committee  Primarily, complaints are reported to the regional offices, because we have direct and local presence in communities. People who are experiencing the impacts of such devices would complain directly to our regional offices.

Industry committee  Absolutely.

Industry committee  We would be judging what compliance activity should be taken. There may be, for example, seizure of the jammers. There may be AMPs used as a compliance tool. There may be simple education for somebody who might be a truck driver who was just trying to use a jammer so that his bos

Industry committee  If the legislation is put in place, AMPs would be a tool that could also be used to encourage compliance against jammers. If somebody were found with a jammer, the first time we might educate. If they were found with jammers a second time, we might—

Industry committee  It would be interference again, so that your cellphone is not operating properly. Or it could be some form of damage to the network.

Industry committee  Fax machines will fall under the provisions of the Telecommunications Act. Adam, would you like to add?

Industry committee  There would be four primary violations. The first is that you would be operating without a licence or in violation of the conditions of licences that are outlined. Second would be that you are operating equipment that does not meet the standards. The third would be that you're op