Status of Women committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. For us, there was a procedural connection between amendment G‑3 and these amendments. Paragraph (j) of amendment G‑3 proposes to amend Bill S‑205 by replacing lines 21 and 22 on page 4 with the following: (10) A provincial court judge may, on applicati

Status of Women committee  I'm not sure that I can totally explain why, but I do want clarify a few things. It is true that the French version of Ms. Lewis's subamendment refers only to the word “croire”. The reason is that it appears in line 10 of the French version of the bill, replacing the first word

Status of Women committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Right now, we are dealing with amendment G‑3. Ms. Lewis has proposed a subamendment—

Status of Women committee  No, it's a subamendment to G‑3. The subamendment doesn't have a code, but the reference number is 12766880. My colleague will show you the text of the subamendment in a moment. The current debate pertains to Ms. Lewis's subamendment, which seeks to amend G‑3. That is still being

Status of Women committee  Yes.

Status of Women committee  No, CPC‑1 will be proposed later if necessary to ensure that the bill is consistent.

Status of Women committee  Yes.

Status of Women committee  It was sent on Friday.

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. The issue is a potential line conflict. Since a line can only be amended once in a bill, unless there's unanimous consent later on to revert back and reconsider it, and considering where the potential amendment you may want to make in clause 8 would occur,

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. That is the usual process for the clause already contained in the bill; however, when an amendment seeks to create a new clause—for example, in this case, new clause 3.1—by adopting NDP-2, that new clause is automatically created, so you don't have to vote

Status of Women committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. It's just to ensure that we have this correct. We're looking at amendment G-3, “(a) replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 2 with the following”, and it's that first portion, where we have 810.03(1). Dr. Lewis's amendment is “810.03(1) Any person who believes”

Government Operations committee  We have verified and analyzed the amendments submitted that are currently in the bundle, and this issue has not been raised by our team.

Government Operations committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Fergus, to confirm, you are referring to clause 14, clause 15, clause 16, clause 17 and clause 18.

Government Operations committee  Thank you, Mr. Fergus. On one last point of clarification, you mentioned these are amendments that have been proposed. We currently don't have an amendment to clause 14.

Government Operations committee  Negate, okay. It's to negate clause 14, for example. The procedure we're asked to follow according to the rules is that an amendment to delete a clause is not admissible. It would be necessary to vote down the clause. When the chair puts the question on a particular clause and