Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 631-645 of 662
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Mr. Chairman, I need to remind the member that in the last Parliament we had two or three votes that were won by one vote or were tied and the Speaker had to break the tie. A member's presence could arguably make a difference.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  It's in the Canada Elections Act.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  No. We actually did some research on that. We found that it's been there since the 1920s. What's proposed in Bill C-2 is along the same lines.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  I don't know the answer to that.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  I'm told that it was one member.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  The year the member was not sitting, I'm told, was 2006.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Well, these things aren't necessarily made public, I suppose.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  They're all substantive, I might say, but some of them might be consequential to other--

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Mr. Chairman, as the lawyer for the House of Commons, members of Parliament, and committees, naturally my view would be in favour of the interests of that institution. The short answer to the member's question is that I don't think you should play around with your privileges, and

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  I believe, Mr. Chairman, that my office can have available to any member who asks for them amendments reflecting the concerns raised in this report and have them available for the member tomorrow. I haven't counted how many there would be. It could be 40, the deputy law clerk t

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Well, it's more than that. There are procedural rules about how you draft bills, so I can't draft as I would like to, cutting from whole cloth. You have to draft based on the bill you have in front of you, so you have to go where the procedural rules allow you to go. That doesn'

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  But not all. Section 49 is a problem.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  I think you have to make a constitutional amendment, and that's not something you can do overnight, relative to the timelines of this bill. I think the only solution is to remove the provision pertaining to secret ballots.

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Mr. Martin, if you didn't build a house right and there was an ability to take you to court and have you demonstrate that you built a house wrong, I don't think as a carpenter you would like that. I'm not sure if you are a carpenter, Mr. Martin, but if you're a builder and you do

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh

Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee  Legally, the appointment is made by Governor in Council, but its statute requires as a condition before that that the House approve the appointment. But it doesn't happen legally until the order in council is made. That's part one of the indices of being in an executive-type posi

June 5th, 2006Committee meeting

Rob Walsh