Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 72900
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canadian Heritage committee  -founded and proven claims of abuse.” I will also add to that whistle-blower's statement another whistle-blower's statement, that they were told that they had to sign an NDA in order for their case to be investigated. These are chilling stories for any media organization, but I

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

Niki AshtonNDP

Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee  Thank you so much for explaining all that to us. To the young people who are in the streets—I hope that some of them are watching—know that we Canadians are standing with them and supporting them in their bravery and their courage in fighting for democracy and for their rights

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

Anita VandenbeldLiberal

Canadian Heritage committee  Monsieur Dubé and Ms. Tait, welcome to our committee. Ms. Tait, I'm going to read off part of the motion that was adopted by this committee to be able to undergo this study: That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee invite the CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, Catherine

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

Patricia LattanzioLiberal

Foreign Political Interference, Violence or Intimidation   in order to bar bad actors from entering Canada. At the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, we completed a study on foreign interference last year. We heard valuable testimony on steps Canada could take to address foreign interference, including a foreign

May 6th, 2024House debate

Parm BainsLiberal

Impact Assessment Act  Pursuant to Standing Order 93, the recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, May 8, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. It being 2:16 p.m., the House stands adjourned until Monday, May 6, at 11 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). (The House

May 3rd, 2024House debate

The Deputy SpeakerConservative

Information & Ethics committee  The motion would read as follows: That, pursuant to standing order 108(3)(h) and in light of new media reports, the committee invite, in the first place, the Minister Randy Boissonault for a one-hour meeting, and after, the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, Konrad

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

Information & Ethics committee  Just give me a second. Sorry about that. The amendment from Mr. Villemure would be.... Okay, this is different from the other version I got. The amendment from Mr. Villemure would be to keep the beginning that says, “Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h), and in light of new

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The Clerk

Information & Ethics committee  . I would like to move an amendment further to Mr. Barrett's motion. The amendment, as proposed, reads as follows: “Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h) and in light of recent media reports, the committee…”. That is what is already there. I move that we delete everything else

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

René VillemureBloc

Information & Ethics committee  Chair, I'll give notice of a motion that I'd like to move. It reads, “That pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h) and in light of new media reports, the committee undertake an immediate study into Minister Randy Boissonnault’s allegations of fraud and contravention of ethics

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

Michael BarrettConservative

Information & Ethics committee   that you will receive the draft a week from Friday, so we are going to have to make time for that. The report, as it stands in draft right now, is about 50 pages long, and there are roughly 14 recommendations. That may take some time to deal with. I have asked the clerk to look

May 7th, 2024Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Questions on the Order Paper  Mr. Speaker, I ask that all questions be allowed to stand.

May 7th, 2024House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Business of the House   the parties and if you seek it, I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion: That, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, during the debate pursuant to Standing Order 66 on Motion No. 54 to concur in the eighth report of the Standing

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Steven MacKinnonLiberal

Public Complaints and Review Commission Act   the legislation. We cannot have that. In order to effectively represent the will of the Canadian people and in order to be effective parliamentarians, we need to have opportunities to debate this legislation. The Liberal government has allowed this legislation to die on the Order Paper

May 3rd, 2024House debate

Dane LloydConservative

Amendments to the Standing Orders   that for the NDP, it has always been important to have a consensus in the House. When it comes to amending the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, from Tommy Douglas right up until today, we have always stressed the importance of consensus. That is why we are supporting Motion No. 109. I

April 29th, 2024House debate

Peter JulianNDP

House debate  A motion to adjourn the House under Standing Order 38 deemed to have been moved.

May 6th, 2024House debate