Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Canadian Heritage committee -founded and proven claims of abuse.” I will also add to that whistle-blower's statement another whistle-blower's statement, that they were told that they had to sign an NDA in order for their case to be investigated. These are chilling stories for any media organization, but I
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
Niki AshtonNDP
Subcommittee on International Human Rights committee Thank you so much for explaining all that to us. To the young people who are in the streets—I hope that some of them are watching—know that we Canadians are standing with them and supporting them in their bravery and their courage in fighting for democracy and for their rights
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
Anita VandenbeldLiberal
Canadian Heritage committee Monsieur Dubé and Ms. Tait, welcome to our committee. Ms. Tait, I'm going to read off part of the motion that was adopted by this committee to be able to undergo this study: That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee invite the CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, Catherine
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
Patricia LattanzioLiberal
Foreign Political Interference, Violence or Intimidation in order to bar bad actors from entering Canada. At the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, we completed a study on foreign interference last year. We heard valuable testimony on steps Canada could take to address foreign interference, including a foreign
May 6th, 2024House debate
Parm BainsLiberal
Impact Assessment Act Pursuant to Standing Order 93, the recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, May 8, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. It being 2:16 p.m., the House stands adjourned until Monday, May 6, at 11 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). (The House
May 3rd, 2024House debate
The Deputy SpeakerConservative
Information & Ethics committee The motion would read as follows: That, pursuant to standing order 108(3)(h) and in light of new media reports, the committee invite, in the first place, the Minister Randy Boissonault for a one-hour meeting, and after, the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, Konrad
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
The Clerk
Information & Ethics committee Just give me a second. Sorry about that. The amendment from Mr. Villemure would be.... Okay, this is different from the other version I got. The amendment from Mr. Villemure would be to keep the beginning that says, “Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h), and in light of new
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
The Clerk
Information & Ethics committee . I would like to move an amendment further to Mr. Barrett's motion. The amendment, as proposed, reads as follows: “Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h) and in light of recent media reports, the committee…”. That is what is already there. I move that we delete everything else
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
René VillemureBloc
Information & Ethics committee Chair, I'll give notice of a motion that I'd like to move. It reads, “That pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h) and in light of new media reports, the committee undertake an immediate study into Minister Randy Boissonnault’s allegations of fraud and contravention of ethics
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
Michael BarrettConservative
Information & Ethics committee that you will receive the draft a week from Friday, so we are going to have to make time for that. The report, as it stands in draft right now, is about 50 pages long, and there are roughly 14 recommendations. That may take some time to deal with. I have asked the clerk to look
May 7th, 2024Committee meeting
The ChairConservative
Questions on the Order Paper Mr. Speaker, I ask that all questions be allowed to stand.
May 7th, 2024House debate
Kevin LamoureuxLiberal
Business of the House the parties and if you seek it, I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion: That, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, during the debate pursuant to Standing Order 66 on Motion No. 54 to concur in the eighth report of the Standing
May 2nd, 2024House debate
Steven MacKinnonLiberal
Public Complaints and Review Commission Act the legislation. We cannot have that. In order to effectively represent the will of the Canadian people and in order to be effective parliamentarians, we need to have opportunities to debate this legislation. The Liberal government has allowed this legislation to die on the Order Paper
May 3rd, 2024House debate
Dane LloydConservative
Amendments to the Standing Orders that for the NDP, it has always been important to have a consensus in the House. When it comes to amending the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, from Tommy Douglas right up until today, we have always stressed the importance of consensus. That is why we are supporting Motion No. 109. I
April 29th, 2024House debate
Peter JulianNDP
House debate A motion to adjourn the House under Standing Order 38 deemed to have been moved.
May 6th, 2024House debate