In terms of regional flexibility, there are a couple things. One, we're putting in a lot of money federally under our programs. The provinces still have the flexibility to offer regional programs to deal with regional issues.
In terms of the disaster relief framework, that actually responds to the regional issues. If we look at the disasters that have taken place over the last ten to fifteen years, aside from maybe BSE, most of them have been regional. The disaster relief framework that ministers will be discussing next week in Calgary allows a regional response to a disaster. Whether it's potato nematode or whether it's avian influenza in B.C., that framework allows the provincial and federal governments to get together to discuss the appropriate response. We still have our national programming, but they can determine the appropriate response to deal with that regional disaster. So there is regional flexibility being built into this new suite of programs in terms of, certainly, disaster relief.
I acknowledge the issue that you've raised about how a margin-based program disadvantages producers who are diversified, because if they have a good year in hogs and a bad year on grains, they're not going to get a CAIS payment, versus somebody who's actually single commodity. But that single-commodity producer is still losing money, because CAIS will only cover 70% of the loss. So the diversified farmer is still better off in that example.