I think there are several elements to that. Let me drill in on the first one that you mentioned, the need for a competitive economic and regulatory environment.
This is not a primary resource part of our economy; this is the manufacturing part of our economy. We move large amounts of grains and oilseeds across our country and around the world with great efficiency, so where the plants will be and where that grain will be processed will be determined by these other factors. So there's no avoiding the need to be competitive. Capital will build plants where it will get the best return. So irrespective of the feedstock cost issues that you raised, in terms of how you regulate the market and how you tax it, you need to be competitive.
In terms of your point about higher support for our primary agricultural producers in the U.S., you're absolutely correct that this is a challenge for our industry. However, I do think this is a way to improve the situation over what it currently is.
Although 10¢ to 12¢ a bushel is a small amount of money when you say it as 10¢ to 12¢, when you multiply it by 250 million bushels, you're looking at a serious amount of money that's going directly into the pockets of grains and oilseeds producers. That's just to meet that initial requirement. If your industry really takes off and you're supplying the U.S. market, that number will increase over time, as you're taking more grains and oilseeds out of the market.