I think if this or any government were to decide to provide the level of support to primary agricultural production that exists in Europe or the United States, it would be a benefit to our industry; there's no question. But I don't foresee $5 billion, $6 billion, $7 billion a year of additional money being spent in the sector to do that.
In lieu of that, I guess the question is whether this is clearly of benefit to primary agricultural producers. Would it be helpful to our industry if we had the kind of equivalent government support for primary agricultural producers here? Absolutely it would be. The fact that we don't have it doesn't mean this isn't still a good thing, and a thing worth doing, and something that will deliver dollars to the farm gate.