Where do I begin? It's not surprising that if there's anything that the multinational grain trade wants to get rid of it is the Canadian Wheat Board and its single-desk selling, because there's no question in my mind that it does give farmers market power. So I would ask Ken, if he could, to outline any benchmark studies that the Canadian Wheat Board has done that would show what the difference is between single-desk and open market selling.
I also want to get in now, while Ken's thinking about that, a question to Mr. Anderson. The government is certainly trying to do anything it can to avoid a plebiscite among producers. Did you talk about any issue during the election other than the Canadian Wheat Board? I mean, gun control, I expect, wasn't a factor. This was a general election, and for the government to assume from that, just because it was part of their platform, that producers should now not have a say in the Canadian Wheat Board goes against, in my view, the essence of democracy.
Opponents of the Canadian Wheat Board are excellent at wordsmithing, I will say that.
Can Mr. Anderson answer this? In your dual-marketing proposal, you've tried to leave the impression that you can have dual marketing and still have single-desk selling. How do you explain that? It's the fact of the matter that there is no choice for those who want single-desk selling when you go to a dual market, because there no longer is single-desk selling as a country.