I also really like the intent of the amendment. I think it reads well and it shows how smart Mr. Atamanenko is, and I'm grateful for it, because it has to be stated. I guess our issue is whether we put something in a bill that wouldn't help the bill.
I've heard the formal response, but I don't know if some of these things couldn't be more helpful in either a preamble or something like that, where we could see that the general direction would be to accommodate these things and reflect some of the things we have heard from the witnesses. So I'll thank the mover for that.