I just call the Department of Transport the “department of railways”, because they're always there for them. Now even the parliamentary secretary is....
Do you not think that both issues could be dealt with at once? Clearly, from the study, and just to look at Mr. Obert's farm, his farm is being overcharged—gouged—$17,000 to $32,000 per year by the railways. Multiply that by the number of farmers and the number of commodities being shipped. Don't you think both issues have to be addressed at once? Both have an impact, and one is the overcharging.
Greg said earlier that the major cost of the lack of service is the lack of competition and that has led to less than adequate service. Isn't that also the reason why there's an overcharging of rates under the revenue cap? There isn't competition and you also have a compliant government: isn't that the reason?