Thank you for the question.
Basically, our information in reading the act is that there is really no reason that a grain company would want to sign that agreement. So far we've been proven right, in that no company has signed that thing. We've been told that the reason is that most of the negotiating power and the advantage is on the railroad side if they sign an agreement.
Plus, with that agreement there is such a long timeframe to get it all set up before an arbitrator steps in, that's another problem.
Also, the accountability, the service contracts, and the premiums and penalities are not really set out clearly, as far as we can see. On the penalty part, when a railway is charged a penalty, if that penalty goes back to the government, clearly it should be going to the shipper or it should be going to the producers.