In terms of the Fair Rail Freight Service Act, I think there are a couple of very important elements of that bill that were recognized in its drafting.
One is that service shouldn't be imposed to the benefit of one shipper to the detriment of another. The arbitrator has to consider the network impact, because we run a bus route not a taxi service. That's how we attain 4.1¢ a tonne-mile. We move a tonne of material one mile on average on the railway for 4.1¢. This has been recognized. Without that network provision in that piece of legislation you could have an arbitrator imposing a service to the benefit of shipper A to the detriment of shipper B when the two are side-by-side. We think that's the right approach, and that's one of the amendments being pushed that would be very detrimental.