This is how I understand it. If we put all the words aside, we have a choice here. Right now, someone who is not a member of a recognized party can put an amendment forward in the House of Commons and then vote for it. If this goes through, that member will no longer be allowed to do that. He or she will then have to come to committee to make the amendment.
What in effect this does is take away the right of someone such as the leader of the Green Party, for example, or of others who have every right to make amendments in the House now, to make those amendments in the House.
That's how I understand it. You either do it here or you do it in the House. If this comes into place, then the person can no longer make those amendments in the House. That's why we oppose this.