Thank you for your question.
I think I'll continue in English, because it's late and I'm slow.
AUTO21 has a number of key goals that we work on. All of our projects are measured against one or more of these goals. One is the enhanced environmental performance of the car and the manufacturing process that makes the car. The next one is the enhanced health and safety performance of the car and the manufacturing processes. The third one is the enhanced economic performance of the companies whom we partner with. So all of our projects are directed at one or more of those kinds of activities. We are always trying to help the companies to develop new processes and materials that will result in better quality cars at lower cost.
Again, I would have to agree with Dennis. I don't think that a $6,000 or $7,000 car is really achievable in North America while, at the same time, being compatible with North American safety standards and environmental performance standards. But I think a lot of our projects are certainly directed at containing costs while enhancing vehicle performance, as measured by safety and environmental performance.
I would have to say as well—and I don't work for the car companies, but work with them—that a modern car is actually a pretty remarkable device, when you measure its performance in environmental and safety terms, as well as its on-road performance, against the performance of a vehicle from the seventies, and then at its cost. It's actually remarkable what you can get nowadays from even the most modest cars on the market.
I'm not sure if I've totally answered your question. We're doing our best on all of those issues—costs, safety, environmental performance—but I don't think anybody really wants to compromise on safety standards and environmental performance, and there is a certain cost below which you really can't go, I think.