Certainly.
With all due respect, Mr. DuPelle, I think that answer was lousy. I don't think you answered the question at all.
What we're talking about is an amendment that takes out the words “to the extent that the services, technology, device, or component do not unduly impair the technological protection measure”. Are you suggesting that blind people are going to take a hammer to the CD? How is it possible that taking that language out is going to interfere? It seems that “unduly impair”, that language.... Is the expectation that people with perceptual disabilities are hackers or something? How would taking those three lines out possibly damage a business model? You are putting the onus on them. You are putting roadblocks in the path of people with perceptual disabilities. That's what you are doing.