I'll answer the question, thank you.
I've always been of the view that the right way to settle this issue was to let farmers decide, to have a fair plebiscite, as required by the current act under section 47.1. When the minister refused to do that, we thought it was incumbent upon ourselves to allow farmers to have a direct say in the future of their own organization, which they pay for.
We went ahead with that plebiscite. It's cost was $275,000, with some advertising costs on top of that.