We have more current figures, too, if you'd like.
The point I'm making is that when there's a single desk, as shown in the tall bar in this graph, the prices are highest. When the single desk was eliminated in 1921, down they went. When the five-year Wheat Pool was put in place in 1924, up they went. When the pool was gone, down they come again. When the CWB single desk was put in place, they went up again.
I'll put it in simple terms so that everybody can understand the basic principle: Wheat Board, good; no Wheat Board, bad; voluntary Wheat Board, bad; compulsory single desk, good.
This is a very complex debate, but it all comes down to the fact that throughout history your side has no evidence that things are going to be better. We have 75 years—100 years—of empirical evidence that when there is a single-desk compulsory Wheat Board in place, it's to the advantage of producers. When it's deleted or struck down, the prices plummet and the return to producers plummets.
So we're urging members to support this idea in the interests of natural justice, basic fairness, and the democracy we all espouse to uphold, especially in Remembrance Week, when we are thinking about our veterans who went to war to fight for democratic principles. We are now watching a sad example take place here of their democratic rights being taken away from them, with, first, not even being allowed to vote on the future of their Wheat Board and, now, not even being allowed to vote for the directors of what voluntary Wheat Board is left. It's a disgrace.