If there are any other comments you or Mr. GĂ©linas would like to make, you can interject at any time.
I have one last point. You mentioned that the Prime Minister may be under a political imperative. You see this as distinct from a legal imperative. That's what puts this bill on safe ground. No matter how strong the political imperative is, as long as it's only a political imperative, would the bill remain on safe constitutional ground?