No, no. Mr. Chairman, on this point, I think that the important difference that strikes me immediately is that 7.1 talks about “for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent” not only “environmental degradation”, but it also says “to prevent adverse health impact”.
Now, it's my hunch that most of us would probably want that included, as well as preventing environmental degradation, but I'm curious to hear Mr. Cullen's response.