Well, it doesn't matter who cares. I'm just saying that their business as usual gave them lower emissions in those two countries. Their population is basically stagnant. They don't have growth in energy-intensive resource industries in most of Europe.
Their business as usual is basically going along at a flat level. They have to do a 30% reduction to get to 30% below 1990 or less. That compares to 50%; I'd say their reduction is far less than that, and ours is a 50% reduction from business as usual. It's far more onerous.