So any European Union citizen can get online and, the last time I checked, check over 1,000 pages of analysis, documentation, targets, plans, calculations, and modelling, all of which has been delivered up well in advance of the Copenhagen round of negotiations. That's my recollection, having looked at the EU site not too long ago, Ambassador, so I'm assuming that's what you are implying by having a plan, having that plan delivered up to 27 nation-states under the rubric of the EU, and having all of that fulsomely done in advance of the Copenhagen round.
Can I go to a second theme for your advice? There's a lot of talk from some quarters in this country and elsewhere. The most prominent spokespersons who put forward a view that I'm going to repeat are very hard-right Republican senators in the United States Senate, but there is a position out there that it is impossible to have a true and verifiable international credit system. Both of you have spoken to it in your remarks about the verifiability, the measurability, and even the sincerity of those credits.
In this nation, not to get into detailed debate, it is the view of one party that international credits shall not form a part of our plan and shall not be even considered in the context of Copenhagen negotiations. Is it your experience that this view is a mature view and lines up with the preponderance of international practice and opinion?