The current definition is social and economic impacts of the environmental impacts, which is a little bit artful in its formulation, I think. So we would fully support the full inclusion of environmental, social, and economic impacts, except that I have difficulty with this balancing of either/or, because we've already said that the purpose was sustainable development, which is actually trying to make these things work together, not to trade off an unhealthy environment for some money or some jobs, but to find a way forward that actually puts those things together. If we're going to make any meaningful progress, that will be the framework. So it absolutely requires bringing all those aspects together in the assessment and in the decision-making.
On November 24th, 2011. See this statement in context.