Monsieur Garand, I was very interested in your New York City example. I'm quite familiar with that; it's a template for what most urban areas need to do.
In our study of urban conservation, to follow up on that, we coined a phrase, “ecological infrastructure”, and actually recommended to the infrastructure department—the people who implement infrastructure programming—that ecological infrastructure be considered for programming under our infrastructure programs. It is kind of a radical idea, but I think it's an idea whose time has come. That could unleash significant financial resources for things like wetland creation and wetland conservation. Is that an approach that you would support, either of you?