Thank you, Mr. Bennett.
This is a question for all of you. A number of previous witnesses have talked about how the present process seems to capture an awful lot of small and relatively insignificant projects and misses the big ones, the strategic ones, the big picture ones. I have an example to ask you about. If any of you are familiar with this, I'd love to hear your comments.
The Matawa chiefs in northern Ontario and others have come to me because they are concerned about the Ring of Fire project. It is huge--on the scale of Voisey's Bay, or perhaps bigger. They've been granted a comprehensive review study rather than a joint panel review. It seems to me that this would be a logical one for a joint panel review at the front end, with fewer problems in the long term.
Do any of you have comments on that? Do any of you share my concern as to why we're not doing a joint panel review for the Ring of Fire?