We're always interested in having the most credible of processes. I think the comments we raised in our brief and in our remarks by Ms. Schwartz were really directed at saying we want to see the right level of review for the right level of project.
So if broader planning issues need to be discussed, then they should be discussed and reviewed and vetted in either a strategic assessment or a higher level of review. If we still get down to looking at projects, but at a high level, then those triggers should be at that high level for that comprehensive and significant review. As we get further into the process, if that project is to proceed, then there are permit mechanisms to deal with that.
What we have now is that when a review takes place, all those things are discussed in one review and it becomes very difficult to sort.