I have a report here from Environment Canada that's just a little thing off their website. It's entitled How Are the Great Lakes Doing?. Under the section that says, “Can we eat the fish?”, the first sentence says “Contaminant levels in Great Lakes fish have declined significantly from their historic peaks.”
If the contaminant levels in fish are a proxy for contaminants in the ecosystem itself, it appears to me in terms of contaminants we're actually not doing a bad job in toxics and so on, and we're continuing that work with the Randle Reef.
I heard phosphorus mentioned a lot. We seem to have a toxics management plan in place. It will play out its course. So, Mr. Ullrich, are we now, from this point on, looking at the long term primarily as an issue of phosphorus in the Great Lakes and remediating that?