I know exactly where you're talking about, the farm that you're talking about. The issue though is that at this point, all the minister needs to do is take it into consideration. Taking something into consideration is not a plan. It's sort of like a hope or a wish. You could readily imagine aggressive environmental ministers, or ministers who are less aggressive, driving a bulldozer through that clause. That would be the only thing left, because management plans come and go. My concern is as much for the folks, for want of a better term, south of Steeles Avenue, as it is for the folks north of Steeles Avenue.
To me, there seems to be a mutual interest to draft a clause which gives some measure of ecological and farming integrity to the point where both parties seem to be reasonably satisfied.
Are there comments? Mr. Whittamore.