Unfortunately, we don't know exactly yet, but that does leave a fair number of gaps that are leaving a lot of things completely uncovered, and not covered by provincial jurisdiction either, so it's not a question of duplication.
But to move on further into that, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency had 12.8% of its available funds allowed to lapse; that's $4.1 million. For me, that's not surprising. I assume that's because there are cuts and not so many triggers left. Can you explain that substantial amount of money left over? I'd also like to know if it's going to be carried forward to this year's budget, and how the agency actually overestimated its budget to such a huge percentage.