Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I will continue with questions for the representatives of the Canadian Environmental Law Association because my last three-minute period went by quickly.
In the letter you sent to the committee, you say the following:
Clarifying the Act with respect to what triggers the need for an assessment of a substance (other than the categorization process) because existing provisions of the Act including ss. 70, 71 and 75(3) are not adequate for this purpose;
You say that they are not adequate, or others said that and you added it to your letter. Could you elaborate on that? Why do the triggers seem to be inadequate?