Thank you for the question, Madame Pauzé. I could not agree with you more.
The context in which I would consider Canada as a leader would be in applied water research and technology development. Internationally, we've got a very strong reputation as a water solutions country for the world. This has been borne out by the Trade Commissioner Service, which has done a really phenomenal job of connecting Canadian solutions to challenges in other countries.
Where we fall completely flat, as you've brought up, is to develop those solutions and apply them at home. We're seeing a lot of lagging technology options at home. We're struggling to finance watersheds adequately at home. We're struggling to provide economic and environmental incentives to get creative with some of our policies, and to get creative with some of our innovation. We need boots on the ground.
Yes, there's absolutely a disconnect between our leadership on a world stage with the kinds of technologies that we're exporting, and our ability to actually tackle water issues at home. It's really interesting to me to work with many water technology companies across Canada and hearing the consistent story that even though their technology was developed to tackle a problem in Canada, they have not yet worked in Canada.
Of the 100-plus water and ocean—