Thank you.
You mentioned some of the technologies at home, whether they be for PFAS or any other contaminants and that they would vary on a regional basis. I'm having a quick look online. It looks like a reverse osmosis system at the tap level is going to be cheaper than a larger, commercial variation of that filtration system.
If PFAS, arsenic or any of these other problems are most likely to be dealt with, is that an idea that we need to be looking at from a consumer level, or is it best at a municipal water level? How do you think we would be best able and most affordably to deal with some of these challenges?