More broadly, article 9 of the Bill of Rights Act of 1689, which has been affirmed as part of the constitutional law of Canada and applied by the Federal Court earlier to this George decision—but not mentioned in the George decision, perhaps because it wasn't necessary—makes it clear that no court or other place can question the proceedings of the House.
In a sense, you might more properly say that the jurisdiction of courts and other proceedings is limited; they can't look at what happens before committees, or in the House. Those proceedings are protected from any review, examination, or questioning by any outside body, process, or authority. Okay. That's essentially what that's saying. You can call it a privilege if you like, but strictly speaking it's a limitation on the jurisdiction or authority of those outside bodies.
The bottom line is that what you say to this committee stays with this committee, as it were, in terms of any other legal proceedings.