Evidence of meeting #1 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Richard Rumas

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

In respect to the members—

11:30 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

I thought you were talking about Mr. Hubbard's motion. That is why I was not interrupting.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Mr. Hubbard did not make a motion. He moved the motion before you. He just moved the existing motion. That's all he's done.

So I've called the question.

(Motion agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Now, on the subcommittee on agenda and procedure, colleagues, these are guidelines that guide the committee from time to time. If members should want to reconsider any of these at any time, the committee has the authority to do that. So give it some thought so we can adjust as necessary, if necessary.

Can I have a mover?

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Dean Del Mastro Conservative Peterborough, ON

I would like to move that.

(Motion agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

On reduced quorum, do we have a mover?

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Mr. Chair, may I speak to this next one?

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Madame Lavallée.

11:30 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

I do not want to move the motion, I want to talk about it.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Do we have a mover for the motion?

11:30 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

I want to speak against the motion, Mr. Chairman.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

It may die for a lack of a mover.

Mr. Del Mastro is going to move that motion on reduced quorum.

Mr. Hiebert.

11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Thank you, Chair.

I'd like to just simply make one addition: that at the end of the motion as it's currently stated that it read “and one member of the government”, just to make sure we have somebody present for a quorum.

11:30 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Okay, we have an amendment on the table.

Speaking to the amendment, Madame Lavallée.

11:30 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

I do not want to speak about this amendment, Mr. Chairman. I raised my hand to speak about the motion as a whole, because I do not agree with it. The current requirements regarding quorum are appropriate, and we do not need to change them. I do not see why we would hear from witnesses with only three members presents. That would probably never work very well. In addition, it would not be polite to our guests, to say the least.

Furthermore, Mr. Hiebert is suggesting that there must be a representative from his party present. The Conservatives should simply turn out for meetings. I fail to see why their presence is required for quorum. That makes absolutely no sense at all.

I will be opposing the amendment even more strongly, but I am also opposed to the motion on reduced quorum. I think the current quorum is appropriate.

11:35 a.m.

Bloc

Gérard Asselin Bloc Manicouagan, QC

What is the current quorum?

11:35 a.m.

Bloc

Carole Lavallée Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC

At the moment, it is the majority of committee members.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

The motion on the table is as printed in front of you. An amendment has been proposed to add the phrase “and one member of the government” at the end. We are at debate.

Mr. Martin.

11:35 a.m.

NDP

Pat Martin NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

I'll pass, thank you.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Mr. Thibault.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Robert Thibault Liberal West Nova, NS

I'm going to be voting against this amendment, because it would mean that if government members on the committee chose not to hear from a witness or to discuss a motion, they would simply have to be absent, and the committee would be unable to proceed. That could tie the committee's hands, so I cannot support that.

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Paul Szabo

Mr. Wallace, please.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

I just want to comment on that previous comment.

To be fair then, if we're talking about fairness, including one member of the opposition applies in the same way. If the opposition decided not to show up—

11:35 a.m.

Liberal

Robert Thibault Liberal West Nova, NS

It's not “official opposition”; it's just “opposition”. It could be two and one.

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay, thank you for that. It's three members of all the opposition. I thought it was “official opposition”.